One of Hollywood’s “Big Six” companies, Universal Pictures is an American film production company owned by Comcast through its directly owned subsidiary NBCUniversal. In Universal City, California, at 100 Universal City Plaza Drive, are its production facilities. New York City is home to the corporate headquarters and distribution centers. The Motion Picture Association of America includes Universal Studios in its membership (MPAA). The German Carl Laemmle, also known by his stage name “LEM-lee,” Mark Dintenfass, Charles O. Baumann, Adam Kessel, Pat Powers, William Swanson, David Horsley, Robert H. Cochrane, and Jules Brulatour established Universal Pictures in 1912.

Universal Pictures lists as the fourth-oldest major studio in the world, behind the illustrious French studios Gaumont Film Corporation and Pathe and the Danish Nordisk Film company. Six movies produced by Universal Studios, including Jaws (1975), E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982), Jurassic Park (1993), Despicable Me 2 (2013), Furious 7 (2015), and Jurassic World (2015), set records at the box office. The first three of these movies, all directed by Steven Spielberg, were the top movies at the time of their preliminary releases. Among those films Jurassic Park and Jurassic World are identified as the most well-known movies.

John Hammond, an entrepreneur, and his biotech corporation InGen produced Jurassic Park. The park actually was on Isla Nublar, while the “backstage” industrial floor was on Isla Sorna. The park never had a proper opening. The park’s actual breakdown was caused by industrial sabotage and a hurricane, but various problems with the park’s infrastructure and operating practices would have eventually caused it to fail anyhow. Simon Masrani’s multifaceted firm, which bought InGen’s assets when the company was dissolved, is the one that created Jurassic World. On both islands, the dinosaurs that were free roaming were captured and brought back into captivity. Up until the Indamines Rex tragedy in 2015, the park opened in 2005 and ran well for almost ten years. The success of the park was primarily attributed to learning from Hammond’s mistakes, such as ensuring that the dinosaurs were properly cared for and employing stronger security measures rather than simply choosing flora for its visual appeal without considering its potential health risks. 

There were several characters in Jurassic Park to get to know. Many of these characters, including Alan Grant, Ellie Sattler, Ian Malcolm, John Hammond, and others, were essential to the plot. Both the prehistoric park and them were prominent themes in Jurassic Park. Jurassic World offers a broad view of its characters while also combining many of the Jurassic Park characters into a select few. John Hammond is clearly embodied by Claire who is Bryce Dallas Howard, and Owen who is Chris Pratt is a collection of several characters from Jurassic Park. The conflict between Owen and Claire is comparable to John Hammond’s battle with the Jurassic Park scientists with some added sexual tension. The dividing line is that each of these Jurassic Park personalities is fragmented by Owen. Alan Grant, Ian Malcolm, and Robert Muldoon. Among others, “Clever Girl Guy” gave him his sardonic alpha demeanor, his moral consciousness of respect for the species, and his “badassness.” Character development will be streamlined for Jurassic World and will primarily be embodied by Chris Pratt. 

Since 1993, when Jurassic Park was first released, technology has advanced significantly. Without the sophistication of today’s computer-generated sequences, Steven Spielberg had to improvise. The lifelike dinosaurs in Spielberg’s Jurassic Park were created using animatronics, and the results are truly remarkable. Spielberg was able to transcend the constraints of his era to produce a visual classic, much like George Lucas achieved with the initial Star Wars movies. On the other side, Jurassic World makes extensive use of CGI. Don’t get me wrong, the CGI is fantastic, but I feel like it still lacks the originality and creativity of the first movie. 

For its first two installments, Jurassic World was a monster or horror series with a traditional “our destroyer is of our own making” plot centered on the hybrids created by Indamines rex and Indoraptor. The I-powers rexes were too much for JW security to manage, and its psychological instability is exacerbated by the fact that it was mostly created using the genes of a social animal and maintained in isolation after killing its sibling. The Indoraptor is a classic slasher movie bad guy who clearly enjoys setting traps and carrying out heinous acts of violence. The underlying theme is still the peril of human hubris, but this time it is focused on attempting to alter reality in order to achieve the goals. 

The Jurassic Park movie serve as a good example of how the writers and directors created stuff up as they went along. Like the first novel, the first movie may stand alone as a standalone tale. It begins with a novel idea, builds a story around it, and ends the book. The opening of that book by the second entry stretches plausibility, yet it nonetheless provides a direct and magnificent conclusion to the crucial incidents of the first entry. While acting as a lone adventure about stupid people stranded on the island, the third movie makes no such attempt. It essentially acts as a B-movie with a blockbuster budget, adding nothing else. 

The movie’s messages are what set Jurassic Park apart from other generic monster movies. The first movie has a strong subject about how Man interferes with nature, and it brilliantly conveys that topic through sympathetic characters, thoughtful reflection, and brutal carnage. Unfortunately, its sequels don’t go much further. The Lost World makes an effort to reframe the premise as a conflict between corporate greed and environmental concerns, but it falls short of fully realizing this promise. The third film further detracts from this flaw. Once more, it doesn’t explain anything about the themes it presents.

The thematic foundation of the previous movie is expanded in Jurassic World, on the other hand, and a number of new problems are raised. How would shareholders feel if they saw dinosaurs living with other animals at the zoo? How far would they go in their unscrupulous pursuit of more spectacular entertainment? Should humans help these species if a new extinction threat arises? The conflict between intervention and a more hands-off approach, however, permeates each of these movies, giving viewers pause for thought. He might not have planned the change in perspective. Because it emphasizes that humans can’t possible handle the power they’ve unleashed, the original Jurassic Park takes a very pessimistic approach to the topic.

Yet again, it’s worth watching any branch of this franchise. Although each have some glaring flaws, the undeniable virtues far exceed these flaws. They explore the age-old idea of resurrecting dinosaurs and also offer thrilling adventures. But in the end, Jurassic Park proves to be the most creative of the two. The execution of Jurassic World just cannot reach the peaks of the original great or its sequel, but the film may have more to say in the long run as a result of a more coherent concept.

Share.
Leave A Reply

Exit mobile version